Webhook vs Polling
Two approaches to getting real-time data. Each has trade-offs.
The Problem
Your application needs to know when something happens in another system. You have two options: poll for changes or receive webhooks.
Polling
Polling means asking the server 'anything new?' at regular intervals. Simple to implement, but wasteful.
Pros:
- Simple to implement
- No server-side setup needed
- Works with any API
Cons:
- Wastes bandwidth — most polls return 'nothing new'
- Delayed detection — you only find out on your next poll
- Rate limiting — APIs limit how often you can poll
- Scales poorly — 1000 customers polling every 5s = 200 requests/sec
Webhooks
Webhooks mean the server sends you a notification when something happens. More efficient, but requires setup.
Pros:
- Real-time — notified instantly when something happens
- Efficient — no wasted requests
- Scales well — server handles the load
- Standard format (Standard Webhooks)
Cons:
- Requires endpoint setup
- Need to handle retries and failures
- Must verify signatures for security
Comparison
| Özellik | Polling | Webhook |
|---|---|---|
| Gecikme | Dakikalar | Saniyeler |
| Verimlilik | Düşük (israf istekler) | Yüksek (yalnızca itme) |
| Karmaşıklık | Basit | Orta |
| Ölçekleme | Zor | Kolay |
| Güvenilirlik | Zamanlamayı siz kontrol edersiniz | Gönderene bağlı |
| Hız limitleri | Siz çarparsınız | Gönderen yönetir |
When to Use Polling
- The API doesn't support webhooks
- You need very infrequent updates (daily/weekly)
- You're building a quick prototype
When to Use Webhooks
- You need real-time updates
- High volume of events
- You want to reduce API calls
- Building production integrations
Hybrid Approach
Many systems use both: webhooks for real-time updates, polling as a fallback. HookSniff supports this pattern with its message poller API.