HookSniff vs Convoy
Looking for a Convoy alternative? Convoy's GitHub repository is no longer actively maintained. HookSniff offers active development and managed hosting.
| Feature | 🪝 HookSniff | Convoy |
|---|---|---|
| SDK count | 11 | 1 (Go) |
| FIFO delivery | ✅ | ❌ |
| CloudEvents | ✅ | ❌ |
| Schema registry | ✅ | ❌ |
| Self-hosted | ✅ | ✅ |
| Open source | ✅ | ✅ |
| 8-language i18n | ✅ | ❌ |
🪝 Why Choose HookSniff
- 11 SDKs: Node, Python, Go, Rust, Ruby, Java, Kotlin, PHP, C#, Elixir, Swift. Convoy is Go-only.
- Managed cloud: Deploy in minutes. Convoy requires self-hosting.
- FIFO + CloudEvents: Ordered delivery and standard event format. Convoy has neither.
📦 When to choose Convoy
Convoy is a good fit for Go-native teams that want a lightweight, self-hosted webhook service. If your entire stack is Go and you prefer minimal dependencies, Convoy's single-language focus can be an advantage.
⚠️ Note on Convoy
Convoy's GitHub repository is no longer actively maintained. If you're currently using Convoy, consider migrating to an actively maintained alternative. HookSniff, Svix, and Hook0 are all good options depending on your needs.